Thursday, February 9 2012

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Syndicate

Polls

Games should by played at:
 
spacer.png, 0 kB
FireBoard
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
nfs server SUMMARY LONG ATTEMPT: NFS server getting "NFS3 Server servername is not responding" message (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: nfs server SUMMARY LONG ATTEMPT: NFS server getting "NFS3 Server servername is not responding" message
#1548
nfs server SUMMARY LONG ATTEMPT: NFS server getting "NFS3 Server servername is not responding" message  
We have a nfs server with several clients over udp.  these clients have normally performed heavy 50~80 GB file(s) copys to the nfs server.  After upgrading to 5.1, we began reciveing floods of nfs3 server servername not responding still trying followed by nfs3 server servername is ok .  the server does utilize gigbit ethernet but a client gets messages over 100 fd. All interfaces have been re-checked.  In the begining the server was running with 16 nfsd, which have been increased to 64.  this reduced the quantity a couple notches, however they can still be reproduced with a 3 gb file in a few minutes. the client still had the default 7 nfsiod which has been increased to 16 and then 24 with the condition getting worse.  reseting the client number of nfsiod to 4 does seem to eliminate the issue, and also throttles network i/o back.  we have reset this back to the default 7. netstat is not showing any dropped connections or full sockets or reaching peak network threads from netstat -m.  nfsstat does continue the log a few badxid's and timeo, but below a percentage point or so which I have been led to believe is ok.  reviewing the mount -l output data, we see that the nfs read & write memory buffers are larger than the prior 4.x version by a factor of 6.  we have tried reducing these buffers, but this seems to make the issue worse.  I am currently thinking about increase udp send & recieve buffers to something larger but less than sb_max and or the nfs mount buffers.   BUT, I have this knawing feeling I am looking in the wrong area. I am wondering if this message means something else like maybe my nfs server disks may not be up to the job.  with some testing I see that minimally configured (64mb of cache) hsz70 are worse than (256mb cache) hsg80.  I would expect though if this was true, to log something for a scsi error which I am not. Any thoughts or brilliant ideas welcomed. pmob
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop

Who's Online

We have 50 guests online

Top 5 games


Street Fighter IV
Editorial Rating: 96%
Rating 55% of the readers
Popularity: 621 votes
Haulage in Europe kanutouren Seniorenpfleger aus Polen


Killzone 2
Editorial Rating: 95%
Rating 83% of the readers
Popularity: 4192 votes
Apartment For Sale In Bur Dubai Alltel prepaid phone Apartment For Sale In Meydan


LittleBigPlanet
Editorial Rating: 95%
Rating 64% of the readers
Popularity: 1072 votes
stag poland Free domains EU Pflege aus Polen


Gears of War 2
Editorial Rating: 94%
Rating 83% of the readers
Popularity: 2195 votes
beinggirl cars.motorization4u.co.uk Herren Pantoffeln - Hausschuhe


Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars
Editorial Rating: 94%
Rating 62% of the readers
Popularity: 586 votes
Fertighaus Isla Mujeres rent a house Seniorenpflegerinnen

Coming Soon

- Nancy Drew: Ransom of the Seven Ships (action) PC
- NCAA Football 10 (Sports) 360 PS3 PSP PS2
- Blood Bowl (Sports / strategy) PSP NDS
- Guitar Hero: Greatest Hits (Puzzle) 360 PS3 Wii PS2
- Guitar Hero: World Tour (Puzzle) PC
- Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs (Family / Action games) PS2 360 PS3
- Virtua Tennis 2009 (Sports) PC
- Battlefield 1943 (Action games) PS3
- Manager Kolarski 2009 (simulation) PC
- Battlefield 1943 (Action games) 360
- World War II General Commander - Operation: Watch on the Rhine (strategy) PC
spacer.png, 0 kB